1980 Dodge Aspen vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Dodge Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Dodge Aspen would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Dodge Aspen (101 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Dodge Aspen should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1980 Dodge Aspen is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Dodge Aspen. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Dodge Aspen | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Aspen | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2490 mm |