1980 Dodge Aspen vs. 2008 Ford Bantam
To start off, 2008 Ford Bantam is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Dodge Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Dodge Aspen would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Dodge Aspen weights approximately 525 kg more than 2008 Ford Bantam.
Because 1980 Dodge Aspen is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Dodge Aspen. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Dodge Aspen (232 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Bantam. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Dodge Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Dodge Aspen | 2008 Ford Bantam | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Aspen | Bantam |
Year Released | 1980 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 232 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 117.5 mm | 75.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2670 mm |