1980 Dodge Aspen vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Dodge Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Dodge Aspen would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1980 Dodge Aspen. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1980 Dodge Aspen.
Because 1980 Dodge Aspen is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Dodge Aspen. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Dodge Aspen. (231 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Dodge Aspen.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Dodge Aspen | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Dodge | Honda |
| Model | Aspen | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 231 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4554 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1819 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2619 mm |
