1980 Dodge Omni vs. 2003 Opel Omega
To start off, 2003 Opel Omega is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Opel Omega weights approximately 738 kg more than 1980 Dodge Omni.
Because 2003 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Dodge Omni | 2003 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Dodge | Opel |
| Model | Omni | Omega |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1716 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 146 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1733 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 75 L |
