1980 Dodge Omni vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 1,783 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Dodge Omni (65 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Dodge Omni should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Kangoo (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Dodge Omni. (115 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Kangoo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Dodge Omni.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Dodge Omni | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Omni | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1715 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 21.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2630 mm |