1980 Dodge Omni vs. 2011 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2011 Dodge Challenger is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 1409 kg more than 1980 Dodge Omni.
Because 2011 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Dodge Omni | 2011 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Dodge | Dodge |
Model | Omni | Challenger |
Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 470 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 2404 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5022 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 72 L |