1980 Ferrari 208 vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 1980 Ferrari 208 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph Renown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Ferrari 208 (153 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Ferrari 208 should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Ferrari 208 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Ferrari 208 (171 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1980 Ferrari 208 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Ferrari 208 | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Ferrari | Triumph |
| Model | 208 | Renown |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66.8 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 92 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2750 mm |
