1980 Ferrari 208 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ferrari 208. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ferrari 208 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (420 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1980 Ferrari 208. (153 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1980 Ferrari 208.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (569 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 398 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Ferrari 208. (171 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Ferrari 208.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Ferrari 208 | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Ferrari | Chevrolet |
Model | 208 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66.8 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2852 mm |