1980 Fiat 126 vs. 1967 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1980 Fiat 126 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Cougar (137 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1980 Fiat 126. (24 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1980 Fiat 126. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 815 kg more than 1980 Fiat 126. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Fiat 126 | 1967 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Fiat | Mercury |
Model | 126 | Cougar |
Year Released | 1980 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 652 cc | 4940 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 585 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2830 mm |