1980 Fiat 127 vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 1980 Fiat 127 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1980 Fiat 127. (44 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 1980 Fiat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 645 kg more than 1980 Fiat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Fiat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Fiat 127 | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | Fiat | Pontiac |
| Model | 127 | Tempest |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 901 cc | 3524 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 705 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2930 mm |
