1980 Fiat 127 vs. 1979 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 1980 Fiat 127 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Pontiac Trans Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Pontiac Trans Am would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am (220 HP) has 176 more horse power than 1980 Fiat 127. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am should accelerate faster than 1980 Fiat 127.
Because 1979 Pontiac Trans Am is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Pontiac Trans Am. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Fiat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am (434 Nm) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Fiat 127. (64 Nm). This means 1979 Pontiac Trans Am will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Fiat 127.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Fiat 127 | 1979 Pontiac Trans Am | |
| Make | Fiat | Pontiac |
| Model | 127 | Trans Am |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 901 cc | 6555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 220 HP |
| Torque | 64 Nm | 434 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 104.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 67.7 mm | 95.3 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 5040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2750 mm |
