1980 Fiat 128 vs. 1963 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1980 Fiat 128 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,596 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph Vitesse (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1980 Fiat 128. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph Vitesse should accelerate faster than 1980 Fiat 128. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph Vitesse weights approximately 5 kg more than 1980 Fiat 128. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Triumph Vitesse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Triumph Vitesse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Fiat 128, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Fiat 128 | 1963 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Fiat | Triumph |
Model | 128 | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1530 mm |