1980 Fiat 128 vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1980 Fiat 128 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1980 Fiat 128. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1980 Fiat 128. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 65 kg more than 1980 Fiat 128. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Fiat 128, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Fiat 128 | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | 128 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1980 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1600 mm |