1980 Fiat 128 vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Fiat 128. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Fiat 128 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 347 more horse power than 1980 Fiat 128. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1980 Fiat 128. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 605 kg more than 1980 Fiat 128. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Fiat 128, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Fiat 128 | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | 128 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1116 cc | 4599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1860 mm |
