1980 Fiat Panda vs. 1996 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1996 Mazda Midge is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Fiat Panda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Fiat Panda would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1980 Fiat Panda. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1980 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Midge weights approximately 257 kg more than 1980 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Fiat Panda. (57 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Fiat Panda | 1996 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | Panda | Midge |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 770 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 57 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 715 kg | 972 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
