1980 Fiat Panda vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Fiat Panda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Fiat Panda would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (73 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1980 Fiat Panda. (48 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1980 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 345 kg more than 1980 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Fiat Panda (147 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 1980 Fiat Panda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Fiat Panda | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Fiat | Renault |
| Model | Panda | Clio |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 843 cc | 1460 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 48 HP | 73 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1165 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2630 mm |
