1980 Ford Fairlane vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Fairlane would be higher.
Because 1980 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Ford Fairlane. (296 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Ford Fairlane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Ford Fairlane | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Fairlane | XU 6 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 296 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
