1980 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2004 Suzuki XL7 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1980 Ford Fairlane. (124 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 1980 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 266 kg more than 1980 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Ford Fairlane (296 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 1980 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Suzuki XL7 | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Fairlane | XL7 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4093 cc | 2736 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 296 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 1670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2810 mm |
