1980 Ford Fairlane vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1980 Ford Fairlane. (124 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1980 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 213 kg more than 2008 Mazda CX-9.

Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Ford Fairlane. (296 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Ford Fairlane.

Compare all specifications:

1980 Ford Fairlane 2008 Mazda CX-9
Make Ford Mazda
Model Fairlane CX-9
Year Released 1980 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4093 cc 3726 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 124 HP 270 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 296 Nm 370 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 4500 RPM
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Vehicle Weight 1404 kg 1191 kg
Vehicle Length 5020 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2880 mm