1980 Ford Falcon vs. 1977 Mazda 616
To start off, 1980 Ford Falcon is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Ford Falcon (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Ford Falcon weights approximately 460 kg more than 1977 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Ford Falcon (228 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1980 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Ford Falcon | 1977 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | 616 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1977 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2480 mm |