1980 Ford Falcon vs. 1998 Jaguar XK

To start off, 1998 Jaguar XK is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XK (445 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 336 more horse power than 1980 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1980 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jaguar XK weights approximately 195 kg more than 1980 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jaguar XK (615 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 387 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Ford Falcon. (228 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1998 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Ford Falcon.

Compare all specifications:

1980 Ford Falcon 1998 Jaguar XK
Make Ford Jaguar
Model Falcon XK
Year Released 1980 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3273 cc 3996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 109 HP 445 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6300 RPM
Torque 228 Nm 615 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1370 kg 1565 kg
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 4420 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1140 mm