1980 Ford Falcon vs. 1998 Kia Elan
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1980 Ford Falcon. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1980 Ford Falcon.
Because 1980 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Ford Falcon (228 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 1980 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Ford Falcon | 1998 Kia Elan | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Falcon | Elan |
Year Released | 1980 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 151 HP |
Torque | 228 Nm | 186 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2270 mm |