1980 Ford Falcon vs. 2000 Panoz AIV
To start off, 2000 Panoz AIV is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Panoz AIV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Panoz AIV (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1980 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Panoz AIV should accelerate faster than 1980 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Ford Falcon weights approximately 190 kg more than 2000 Panoz AIV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Panoz AIV (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Ford Falcon. (228 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Panoz AIV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Ford Falcon | 2000 Panoz AIV | |
Make | Ford | Panoz |
Model | Falcon | AIV |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 407 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2660 mm |