1980 Ford Falcon vs. 2002 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2002 Ford Windstar is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Windstar (200 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1980 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1980 Ford Falcon.
Because 1980 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Ford Falcon | 2002 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Falcon | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3273 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3066 mm |
