1980 Ford Falcon vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2005 Saab 9000 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saab 9000 (115 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1980 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000 should accelerate faster than 1980 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9000 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1980 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saab 9000 (280 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Ford Falcon. (228 Nm). This means 2005 Saab 9000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Ford Falcon | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Falcon | 9000 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 2288 cc |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1585 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2680 mm |