1980 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1980 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1980 Ford Falcon.
Because 1980 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Ford Falcon. (228 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Ford Falcon | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Falcon | Megane |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2630 mm |