1980 Ford Granada vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Granada would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Ford Granada. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Ford Granada | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Granada | Colt |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 179 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2970 mm |