1980 Ford Granada vs. 2012 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2012 Nissan Cube is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Granada would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Cube weights approximately 103 kg more than 1980 Ford Granada.
Because 1980 Ford Granada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Granada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Ford Granada | 2012 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Granada | Cube |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1697 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1268 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1694 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1651 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2530 mm |
