1980 Ford Granada vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Granada would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Ford Granada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Compass (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1980 Ford Granada. (118 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1980 Ford Granada.
Because 2013 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Ford Granada. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Ford Granada (263 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Compass. (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1980 Ford Granada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Ford Granada | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Granada | Compass |
Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 263 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2634 mm |