1980 Ford Monarch vs. 1999 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1999 Mercury Cougar is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,120 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Ford Monarch weights approximately 116 kg more than 1999 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1980 Ford Monarch is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Monarch. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Ford Monarch | 1999 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Ford | Mercury |
| Model | Monarch | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4120 cc | 2530 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1344 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2710 mm |
