1980 Ford Monarch vs. 2000 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,120 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 50 kg more than 1980 Ford Monarch.
Because 1980 Ford Monarch is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Monarch. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Ford Monarch | 2000 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Monarch | Sable |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4120 cc | 2984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2760 mm |