1980 Ford Monarch vs. 2004 Kia Retona
To start off, 2004 Kia Retona is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,120 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Retona weights approximately 410 kg more than 1980 Ford Monarch.
Because 2004 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Ford Monarch. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Ford Monarch has automatic transmission and 2004 Kia Retona has manual transmission. 2004 Kia Retona will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Ford Monarch will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Ford Monarch | 2004 Kia Retona | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | Monarch | Retona |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4120 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2370 mm |
