1980 Ford Monarch vs. 2004 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2004 Nissan Cima is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Cima weights approximately 310 kg more than 1980 Ford Monarch.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Ford Monarch has automatic transmission and 2004 Nissan Cima has manual transmission. 2004 Nissan Cima will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Ford Monarch will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Ford Monarch | 2004 Nissan Cima | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Monarch | Cima |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4120 cc | 4500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1500 mm |
