1980 Ford Monarch vs. 2005 Kia Shuma II
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,120 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 627 kg more than 1980 Ford Monarch.
Because 1980 Ford Monarch is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Monarch. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Ford Monarch has automatic transmission and 2005 Kia Shuma II has manual transmission. 2005 Kia Shuma II will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Ford Monarch will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Ford Monarch | 2005 Kia Shuma II | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Monarch | Shuma II |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4120 cc | 1791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 111 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 2087 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2910 mm |