1980 Ford Taunus vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1980 Ford Taunus. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1980 Ford Taunus.
Because 1980 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Ford Taunus | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Taunus | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2490 mm |