1980 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1992 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 1992 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 58 kg more than 1992 Jaguar XJ220.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 1992 Jaguar XJ220 has manual transmission. 1992 Jaguar XJ220 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Ford Thunderbird | 1992 Jaguar XJ220 | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Thunderbird | XJ220 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4186 cc | 3492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 542 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1422 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1160 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2650 mm |
