1980 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1035 kg more than 1980 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Ford Thunderbird | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Thunderbird | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 4396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 2515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2890 mm |