1980 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2004 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 337 kg more than 1980 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2004 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 2004 Jeep Cherokee has manual transmission. 2004 Jeep Cherokee will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Ford Thunderbird | 2004 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Thunderbird | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 2427 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 144 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1817 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2660 mm |