1980 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1006 kg more than 1980 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Ford Thunderbird | 2009 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Thunderbird | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 4394 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 301 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 2486 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3230 mm |