1980 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2011 Chevrolet Epica

To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 155 kg more than 1980 Ford Thunderbird.

Because 1980 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 2011 Chevrolet Epica has manual transmission. 2011 Chevrolet Epica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1980 Ford Thunderbird 2011 Chevrolet Epica
Make Ford Chevrolet
Model Thunderbird Epica
Year Released 1980 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4186 cc 1991 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 148 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1480 kg 1635 kg
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 4810 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2710 mm