1980 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2011 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 70 kg more than 1980 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 1980 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 2011 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 2011 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Ford Thunderbird | 2011 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Thunderbird | Colt |
Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2500 mm |