1980 GAZ 24 vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 GAZ 24. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 GAZ 24 would be higher.
Because 1980 GAZ 24 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 GAZ 24. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 GAZ 24 | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | GAZ | Renault |
| Model | 24 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
