1980 GAZ 24 vs. 2002 Jaguar XKR
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XKR is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 GAZ 24. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 GAZ 24 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XKR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Jaguar XKR has automatic transmission and 1980 GAZ 24 has manual transmission. 1980 GAZ 24 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XKR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 GAZ 24 | 2002 Jaguar XKR | |
| Make | GAZ | Jaguar |
| Model | 24 | XKR |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2445 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
| Top Speed | 160 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 22 seconds | 5.4 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13 L/100km | 18 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
