1980 GMC Suburban vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 GMC Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 GMC Suburban would be higher. At 4,092 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 GMC Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1980 GMC Suburban. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1980 GMC Suburban.
Because 1980 GMC Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 GMC Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 GMC Suburban (285 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1980 GMC Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 GMC Suburban | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | GMC | Toyota |
| Model | Suburban | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4092 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 219 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2601 mm |
