1980 Holden Commodore vs. 1961 Volvo 220
To start off, 1980 Holden Commodore is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,838 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Holden Commodore (102 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1961 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1961 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Holden Commodore weights approximately 205 kg more than 1961 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Holden Commodore (192 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1980 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Holden Commodore | 1961 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Holden | Volvo |
| Model | Commodore | 220 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2838 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 192 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2610 mm |
