1980 Holden Commodore vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1980 Holden Commodore is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,838 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Holden Commodore (102 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Holden Commodore weights approximately 365 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Holden Commodore | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Holden | Zastava |
| Model | Commodore | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 2838 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2010 mm |
