1980 Holden Commodore vs. 1970 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1980 Holden Commodore is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Triumph 2000 (122 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1980 Holden Commodore. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1980 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1980 Holden Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Triumph 2000 (207 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Holden Commodore. (140 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1970 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Holden Commodore | 1970 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Holden | Triumph |
| Model | Commodore | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1890 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |
