1980 Holden Commodore vs. 1971 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1980 Holden Commodore is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Triumph 2000 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1980 Holden Commodore. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1980 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1980 Holden Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Holden Commodore (140 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Triumph 2000. (136 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1980 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Holden Commodore | 1971 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Holden | Triumph |
Model | Commodore | 2000 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1890 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |