1980 Holden Commodore vs. 1978 Mazda 616
To start off, 1980 Holden Commodore is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 5,042 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Holden Commodore (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Holden Commodore weights approximately 468 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Holden Commodore (352 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1980 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Holden Commodore | 1978 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Commodore | 616 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1978 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5042 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 352 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2480 mm |