1980 Holden Commodore vs. 1996 Nissan Skyline
To start off, 1996 Nissan Skyline is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 2,568 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Nissan Skyline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Nissan Skyline weights approximately 100 kg more than 1980 Holden Commodore.
Because 1980 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Skyline, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Nissan Skyline (367 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Holden Commodore. (140 Nm). This means 1996 Nissan Skyline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Holden Commodore | 1996 Nissan Skyline | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Commodore | Skyline |
Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1890 cc | 2568 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 367 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2730 mm |